The spirit of Barbie is best evoked in her 1959 debut: she is in Bette Davis’ smirk in All About Eve, Coco Chanel’s string of pearls, Marlin Monroe’s mole, and Marchesa Luisa Casati’s enormous eyes, which she famously drew attention to by dropping belladonna in and lining with the world’s first fake eyelashes fashioned out of mink. There is a worldliness to her expression, which she pairs expertly with gold earrings and a chic monochrome striped bathing suit. Which makes it so surprising this doll was introduced to the world as a teenage fashion model.
This weighty tome produced by Assouline and written by Yelda Zonis McDonugh, was created in celebration of the 50 year anniversary of the world’s famous doll in 2009. We are offered the opportunity to look a little deeper into its history of the brand and uncovers some home truths about its origins. For instance, the American Barbie doll had a precursor as the German Lilli doll, almost identical to its 1959 counterpart in every way: in its style (blonde hair, high ponytail) and its enviable anatomical proportions. However, the key difference was that the Lilli doll was not made for children: it was created as a novelty item to celebrate the eponymous pin-up from a comic strip in Hamburg newspaper Bild-Zeitung. Ruth Handler would come across the doll by chance in 1956 on a family trip to Switzerland, and take note how her 15 year-old daughter was entranced by the fashionable shape of the doll and the removable outfits. She took home three Lilli dolls to the States, sensing a gap for a more mature doll in a market flooded with babies and toddlers. On her return, in what will forever be a fascinating and polarizing branding move, Ruth Handler, co-founder of Mattel, decided to market the adult doll as a teenager. Perhaps it was endemic of the cultural climate in the 1950s that was just discovering the creative and commercial possibilities of American youth culture, where female role models in popular culture had once been stratified as either June Cleaver or Lucille Ball. Rebel Without a Cause had come out only a year before in 1955, and Mattel had been built on their forward-thinking business acumen: husband and wife Eliot and Ruth Handler had expanded their picture-framing business in 1945 by making doll furniture out of surplus slats and panels. By 1962, they would be one of the first big name brands advertising on TV, with a spending budget of $5,700,000, (they chose an advertising spot on the Mickey Mouse Club, with the catchy handle “You can tell its Mattel, its swell.”) Mattel was able to purchase rights to the Lilli doll by 1964, halting its production in the same year. Ruth made her choice and she had chosen well, and with her lucrative decision to market a more mature doll to young girls, ironically that doll would develop into a totemic figure synonymous with a cultural obsession for youth.
With that in mind, what is interesting about this book, is that it something of a departure. It debunks the myth of representing Barbie as a trendy ingénue constantly on the lower rungs of the career ladder and returns her to her original siren status as a woman of a certain age. We see Barbie re-imagined as a dark-haired Sophia Loren glamazon; Barbie photographed by Patrick Demarchelier in couture. It is a stark break from the idea of ‘Barbie’ as it currently exists in our lexicon, often used as a pejorative noun to describe someone who is deemed artificial in their tastes, as lacking imagination by pursuing uniform cosmetic standards (and perhaps even going as far as undergoing surgery to achieve them). But how much value is there in stating that the fact Barbie represents artifice is a bad thing? The idea of achieving a ‘fake’ look itself, striving at something so seemingly perfect it has to be unreal, itself requires degrees of self-awareness and artistic license. To know just what to emphasize and what to conceal, the spiritual nip and tuck that will make the difference, is what drives any self-transformation. After all, what is Barbie but a woman who constantly re-invented herself while maintaining a lionized sense of self? Apropos of the 50s culture that birthed her, she is all about the very forgivable narcissism of self-refinement. Which is why at 56 years old, there is still a place for her in popular culture: Moschino successfully channeled the 80s ‘Malibu’ iteration of the muse in their 2015 Spring Summer collection, sending models down the runway in baby blue eyeshadow and pastel sunglasses. The “Barbie” font emblazoned in pink across tank tops and sweaters was surely a moot point, when her legacy in popular culture has always been about the cult of femininity as both an aesthetic and a choice. On the runway it was translated as part-Clueless, part Madonna circa Lucky Star, and the younger generations who bought them will understand it in the playfulness of the make-over: changing your hair; changing your outfit; changing your mind. But for those who still believe Barbie as a brand representing little girls and the colour pink, make no mistake: she is the original grande dame.
By Hadeel Eltayeb
Find 'Barbie' and other titles by Assouline in-store at D'NA